The Richterist Dilemma
“Richterism is not love. It is a tool to bring wealth and a weapon to destroy the enemy.”
Under myself as leader, there were no flaws or issues with Richterism. Every order was law, every dream was reality, and every thought was loyalty. There was no downfall, because everyone was loyal. There was no defeat, because everyone was totally behind me in every war and in every crisis. There was no end, because Richterism was endless, it was eternal, it was meant to be upheld until the death of every able loyalist and body - atleast until a single Richterist remained. Following my retirement, Richterism became a guide on “how to rule”, and various Successors without hesitation embraced this - as it was by requirement. However, Richterism was not specific in doctrine or views. It referenced various empires and leaders who were objectively great, and said they were successful because of the masses and their loyalty to these leaders. Richterism essentially, was a sophisticated ideological idea for fanaticism to the extreme, making it easy to do any group, of any ideology, of any culture, of any nature, because Richterism in definition was simply “obey the leader”, making the values changable to whatever was convenient. It was no doubt simply an element, which further promoted loyalty the way that I wanted and the way that I defined it, and the people exercised this perfectly.
However after my departure as leader, within only a year, people were already redefining Richterism and molding it in their vision. Various variants were created, such as ‘Illiumism’ (under Arxilium) which aimed to replace me with ArxiliumRichterian as leader. This was questioned, but not realized by the masses at first, because Richterist thought could be molded by anyone, who simply had the most power. So henceforth, many oldgens naturally followed this order, and when the leader said I was not the founder, but Arxilium, and that war groups arent the priority, but rather SCPF groups, and that militaristic-loyalism is not the idealism, but rather casual-brotherhood (which had Richterist attributes but didn’t appear as such) was truly what Richterism was, it was followed without question. The 8 year Legacy that I had created, defined, memorialized, and worked so hard for, was within months of a new leader’s command, changed, replaced, redefined, and molded, in his own twisted image. This created various problems which led to the death of this collective, and the forming of various splinters. One of them, would be formed by the individual ErickRichterian, who coined the term “Aleczaenderism”, which is known by it’s shortened name coined by yours truly, “Zaenderism”. This was defined as a Richterism which only followed my ways and my rules, as outlined in the Richterist Portal.