Values
“A movement without a spine is not a movement; a cause without men willing to die for it is meaningless.”
Under Zaenderist Thought, the priority is the upholding of the stability of the project to all avail possible without ceasing or hesitating for the greater good of the people at hand and the leader who has orchestrated it, therefore every thought, value, and action, must be with total loyalty to the leader, because he is the one entirely behind it, as proven time and time again. What Richterist society has succeeded without Aleczaender - what Richterist society has failed with Aleczaender? In every case that I have represented, we have won, and in every case that I have not represented, we have failed. Therefore, who is to say that it is the masses who have built this, or it is the masses that have carried this? Never, in my last 8 years of leading has this ever been the truth, nor will it ever be, due to the nature of this platform. Loyalty is at the forefront, so now we must define what loyalty means, what it is, and how it is in the context of Zaenderism. In the context of politics, we are not centrist, but radical. We are revolutionary reactionaries, autocratic populists, and statist capitalists. Depending on the aesthetic, these could favor one spectrum over the other. When it comes to Zaenderism, the concern is not the aesthetic or way of ruling, but rather the most appealing, attractive, and practical way of ruling for the greatest stability and most power with the capability of winning every war, maximizing every production, and rallying numbers beyond countable measurement. Therefore in the sense of modern politics and controversial everyday events, these views are irrelevant, as we are only concerned with the efforts of the masses towards the state and leader, not the decisions made in private irrelevant to the status of the community. As “aepolitical” as this becomes, the mystery of my beliefs in politics and religion must be explored, and it is the choice of every loyalist on whether or not to embrace this. This is to maintain good optics for the sake of appeal, and because it is irrelevant in the greater scheme of things. Only the most senior of Zaenderists should be double-checking their values to ensure they are in line with my beliefs if their intentions are to befriend me at the most personal levels.
Christian values, remain at the forefront of Zaenderism, based entirely on my beliefs. Values, meaning, not a mandated belief in Jesus Christ or God by the Zaenderists, but rather respect and acknowledgement, that through these values, we will become better, greater human beings. Are most Zaenderists Christians? Yes. Following me in everything including my faith is an extra step, but not mandated, and by no means, pressured, on anyone within the Zaenderist ranks. Any day of the week, an “atheist jewish-zionist homosexual black woman” who has maintained five years of loyalty is a better Zaenderist then a “protestant american-nationalist hetersexual white guy” with only a week of loyalty because they have conducted themselves in the art of forwarding the cause better henceforth bettering the movement - benefiting myself with exposure to more people, which has benefited my values through the preaching of the Gospel and exposure of my ideas to more people who are here because of our openness. This satisfies those who don’t agree with my views as they have a place; and satisfies those who do agree with my views as I have not compromised my views at any capacity.
In every place, Christian symbolism is rooted, encouraged, represented, or inspired, as it will always be with honor to God, but in essence, the community is “secular” in the sense anyone who is loyal to the cause will be welcomed. From anarchists, to communists, to libertarians, to ultra-nationalists, there is many people of different beliefs. But all agree on the following; strong brotherhood, loyalty to Aleczaender, and the promotion of a greater nation-state which will bring upon prosperity to the people. In most cases, we have seen loyalists contradict their political beliefs for the greater good, because of the common separation of personal lives from this platform, which is wise in order for the Zaenderist Thought to be universal to everyone for the sake of a strong unified community. A true Zaenderist is judged based on the fanaticism of their loyalty and the merits of their work, no other contents of an individual’s character will change that judgement unless it impairs the efforts of their work and their loyalty. Finally, we must address the well-being of the people. A Zaenderist is defensive of their leader, they are bold debaters who know all their facts of every controversy and event, and will use it to very advantage against the opposition to prove the intellectual capability but also to provide a great bastion of defense agaisnt our enemies for the sake of Zaenderism’s credibility. Our recent adaptions of forgiveness is necessary, as it is better for the soul. To love everyone is necessary for progression, and is what Christ taught. However, that does not mean to give pearls before swine, as they should be preserved for the open-minded who will listen and entertain us. While forgiveness is common, this does not mean we are to befriend traitors and evildoers who are beyond helping. Treason should not be tolerated, slander should be an unforgettable drastic consequence, and liars totally distrusted. Unrelenting fury must be applied to every treacheryous act, deed, and thought displayed by our enemies, in order to demonstrate the overwhelming power of Zaenderism when used as a weapon against the opposition. Anyone who is in a rush to welcome back old enemies into high positions is untrustworthy, and is as suspect as the very disloyalists who betrayed us.
Those who seek sorrow over a traitor or those who have conducted evil, are weak, and unworthy of Zaenderism. How many Legates replaced, how many Generalissimos purged in Octavium? At every person that said “I miss this” or “This is sad”, I simply cringe. In one moment, “The Imperium is only because of Aleczaender!” and in another, “The Legion will never be the same, without Leopold we are doomed!” This is not only a contradiction, it is pathetic weakness, and is not the conduct of a Zaenderist. Lack of faith in the production of a project, defeatism in the mobilization for war, these are symptons of disloyalty, not elements of truth - rather desperations for reactions that are demoralized. Be suspect of those who show sorrow for a traitor. Additionally, be wary of those who are in a rush to welcome back old enemies who have a history of evil to their name. At every moment of the hour and day, every person must think, “What is Aleczaender thinking, feeling, and saying about this?” to every action, and to that, you have won. To predict my reaction and be as accurate as possible is a goal, but to think and say without even a thought of my take on the matter is not just ignorance, but absent of the goals of Zaenderism. To be unconquerable, we must be in agreement on every matter and in complete total unity behind every crisis. To every traitor, ten-thousand people utter “Good riddance!” and carry on forward, knowing a more loyal person will step forward and continue to carry the mantle. A person that betrays me, an individual that is Anti-Zaenderist, is not thinking of the mass-collective, but rather only of themselves and their rampant uncontrollable opportunism. There is always a good reason for someone’s removal, remember that. Treat those who resign rashly the exact same as removals.